OIML SMART · the CIML leave-behind · For Issuing Authorities · www.oimlsmart.org · 2026-09-01
For Issuing Authorities: the one-pager
Your certification workflow, run the way B 18 describes it. Applications in, samples tracked, test work dispatched, evaluations synthesized, certificates signed: every verdict computed from the Recommendation’s model rather than transcribed from prose. Your liability posture does not widen; the platform does digitally what your authority does today.
What you do today
Applications arrive as scanned forms and emails; review happens in spreadsheets; samples move on paper custody chains; test reports come back as PDFs your officers re-type; the certificate is a signed PDF, and the register entry is a separate act nobody can query.
What changes
- Every application waiting on you, oldest first, its age on the row; the reject is honest (a reason, recorded) and the accept opens the evaluation project.
- The evaluation project is the shared dataspace: samples, custody, dispatch, reports, one place, the applicant viewing what it may.
- Verdicts computed from the model, the decision still yours; the review period runs in the open.
- Certificates as signed data (CNML), registered with the BIML; the public register is the validity reference.
Try it now
- The Issuing Authority console: demo.oimlsmart.org, the Issuing Authority persona (assumed through the identity service), then /app/ia. The review queue is yours.
- The intake flow, narrated step by step: www.oimlsmart.org/demo/ia-intake.
What you can use, and what you can run
The Issuing Authority / Test Laboratory category (of a Member State), quoted, never paraphrased, from the single source: www.oimlsmart.org/services/who-can-run-what. An authority may also run its own instance (the IA-only posture); the deployment-mode matrix is at www.oimlsmart.org/use-cases/deployment-modes.
Who to talk to
info@oimlsmart.org. Ask for a working visit against your own intake process; the pilot shape is one Recommendation, one authority, one laboratory.
Everything on the demo instance is simulated: the cast is fictional and the instance resets nightly. The full page with the performed evidence: www.oimlsmart.org/about/audiences/issuing-authorities · The CIML tour: www.oimlsmart.org/tour · Printed from the site, 2026-09-01.
The sheet above is the print artifact (one page; use your browser’s print). Below, the full quoted entitlement row, kept on screen where there is no page budget:
| Service | Issuing Authority / Test Laboratory (of a Member State) |
|---|---|
| OIML SMART account (the identity service) | ✅ |
| Identity service software | operates under its Member State |
| OIML-CS SMART Platform (cloud) | ✅ their consoles |
| SMART Platform software (self-host) | operates under its Member State’s 🏠 |
| The demo instance | ✅ |
| The Studio viewer | ✅ |
| The Vocabulary | ✅ |
| The status service | ✅ |
| Ommisa, the AI service | ✅ |
| SMART Recommendations content | ✅ |
| The trust registry (organization keys) | ✅ their organization keys |
| The SMI Simulation | ✅ |
| The SMART Twin (SMART+) | roadmap |
- Use — hosted, on the official services
- Self-host — on-prem/cloud, under the category’s own entitlement
- Streaming updates — the rolling channel the deployment runbook names
- The upsell note — see the narratives below the matrix
Quoted from the program's single entitlement source; the full matrix, all member categories by all services, lives atWho can run what.
A body asks: can we self-host?
The honest answer: the entitlement is your Member State’s. An Issuing Authority or Test Laboratory operates its own instance under its proposing Member State’s entitlement — the Member State is the entitled party; the body operates. The IA-only, TL-only, and IA+TL postures exist exactly for this, and the platform’s federation means your instance talks to the OIML-CS platform either way.
The performed capability inventory with dated captures, the diagram, the honest questions.
The leave-behind index.